IN February of 2001, Alan Greenspan, then still the chairman of the Federal Reserve, and still called the “Maestro”, testified to the Senate Budget Committee. The committee wanted to get started on the tax cuts George W. Bush had promised during his campaign. Mr Greenspan gave them his qualified blessing, with an argument that now sounds incredible: he was worried that America would pay down its debt too soon. That week the Clinton administration’s Office of Management and Budget had released its final ten-year budget projections. Firms had just completed several years of capital investments in desktop computers, and workers had become more productive. This had increased corporate revenue, and consequently taxes paid to the government. A long bull market in stocks meant that the Treasury was taking in more in capital gains taxes, too. “The experience of the last five to seven years,” said Mr Greenspan, “has truly been without precedent.” The Clinton administration had apparently left Washington with a gift. The...Continue reading
Artigos Relacionados
- Labour hopes to cut net migration to around 200,000
- Tax break for businesses made permanent
- Autumn Statement: Jeremy Hunt cuts National Insurance but tax burden still rises
- What the Autumn Statement means for you and your money
- Autumn Statement: Hunt denies tax cuts were pre-election giveaway
- Austerity warning for public services after tax cuts
- Barbie movie added £80m to UK economy and used 6,000 extras, Warner Bros says
- What a falling inflation rate means for your finances
- Interest rates expected to be held after small economic growth
- UK facing permanent higher taxes, IFS think tank says