WHEN it comes to inflation, the Federal Reserve sometimes resembles a child freshly emerged from an age-inappropriate horror film. To its members, runaway price increases seem to lurk in every oddly shaped shadow. On June 14th America’s central bank raised its benchmark interest rate for the third time in six months, even as inflation lingered below its 2% target, as it has for most of the past five years. Some critics reckon the Fed’s 2% inflation target istoo constraining. Indeed, in recent comments on a letter from prominent economists calling for a higher target, Janet Yellen, the chairman, signalled openness tothe idea. But the Fed’s problem is less its target than an unforgiving pessimism about American productivity. If its bleak view is wrong, the Fed itself is partly to blame for slow growth.Economists generally treat productivity growth as a “real” factor, outside central-bank control. Thus, it is thought to depend on things such as technological progress, workers’ skill levels and the flexibility of the economy. But productivity growth is cyclical: it varies depending on whether an economy is booming or busting. Central banks might therefore have more influence over it than they are prepared to admit.Economies have a growth speed limit, determined by changes in population and productivity. When unemployment is high, the economy...Continue reading
Artigos Relacionados
- Labour hopes to cut net migration to around 200,000
- Tax break for businesses made permanent
- What the Autumn Statement means for you and your money
- Autumn Statement: Hunt denies tax cuts were pre-election giveaway
- Austerity warning for public services after tax cuts
- Barbie movie added £80m to UK economy and used 6,000 extras, Warner Bros says
- Interest rates expected to be held after small economic growth
- UK facing permanent higher taxes, IFS think tank says
- UK economy grew faster than estimated since Covid
- The deep rooted problem holding back the UK economy