“A MODERN Marx” was how The Economist described Thomas Piketty three years ago, when he was well on his way to selling more than 2m copies of “Capital in the Twenty-First Century”. It was meant as a compliment, mostly: as advice to take the analysis seriously, yet to treat the policy recommendations with caution. The book’s striking warning, of the creeping dominance of the very wealthy, looks as relevant as ever: as Donald Trump’s heirs mind his business empire, he works to repeal inheritance tax. But “Capital” changed the agenda of academic economics far less than it seemed it might. A new volume of essays reflecting on Mr Piketty’s book, published this month, prods economists to do better. It is not clear they can.“After Piketty: The Agenda for Economics and Inequality”, edited by Heather Boushey, Bradford DeLong and Marshall Steinbaum, is a book by economists, for economists. In that it resembles “Capital” itself. Before he was an...Continue reading
Artigos Relacionados
- Labour hopes to cut net migration to around 200,000
- Autumn Statement: Jeremy Hunt cuts National Insurance but tax burden still rises
- Austerity warning for public services after tax cuts
- Barbie movie added £80m to UK economy and used 6,000 extras, Warner Bros says
- What a falling inflation rate means for your finances
- UK facing permanent higher taxes, IFS think tank says
- UK economy grew faster than estimated since Covid
- Labour pledges more watchdog power after Truss mini-budget
- Inflation falls - but things could get worse for many households
- UK economy shrinks more than expected as rain and strikes hit